Nilotinib versus imatinib with early switch from imatinib to nilotinib to obtain treatment‑free remission in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia patients: the analysis of the first co‑primary endpoint
Nilotinib as first‑line therapy leads to a higher rate of deep molecular response (MR4.5) at 24 months compared with imatinib, even when imatinib is switched early to nilotinib.
Treatment‑free remission is one of the most important goals of CML treatment but so far, the best treatment to reach this aim is still undefined, even though it is widely accepted that a sustained DMR is the prerequisite to discontinue TKI. Here we report on the depth of the molecular response, the first co‑primary endpoint of the SUSTRENIM study, in a cohort of newly diagnosed CP‑CML patients randomized 1:1 to be treated with nilotinib or with imatinib followed by switching to nilotinib in absence of optimal response. At the 24 months of follow‑up, 107 of the 448 patients reached an MR4.5 response with a significantly higher frequency within the patients on the nilotinib arm (65 vs 42; p = 0.02). The analysis of the first primary endpoint indicates that, despite the early switch in the IM‑randomized patients, NIL therapy is more effective to induce DMR.
Bizonyítékszint: Klinikai vizsgálat. Formális klinikai vizsgálati eredmény.
Kapcsolódó jelek
- Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia chronic phase patients in third-line setting and beyond: recommendations from a Belgian expert panel in 2025
- Chronic myeloid leukemia: Current guidelines for diagnosis and management
- Information about Project 4: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)
- Prevalence and characterization of germline RAS pathway variants in children with chronic myeloid leukemia
- Drug clinical trial landscape of chronic myeloid leukemia: achieving the endpoint or continuing the journey?