Asciminib as first-line therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review

Rákkutatás · Chronic myeloid leukemia

Asciminib demonstrates superior efficacy and a favorable benefit‑risk profile as first‑line therapy for chronic‑phase CML, with higher molecular response rates than both imatinib and second‑generation tyrosine‑kinase inhibitors.

Purpose: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by the BCR::ABL1 fusion oncogene. Asciminib, a first‑in‑class STAMP (Specifically Targeting the ABL Myristoyl Pocket) inhibitor, represents a novel therapeutic approach distinct from conventional ATP‑competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of asciminib as first‑line therapy in patients with newly diagnosed chronic‑phase CML. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and clinical trial registries through December 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and compassionate use programs evaluating asciminib as first‑line therapy in adult patients with chronic‑phase CML. Primary outcomes included molecular response rates (major molecular response [MMR], MR4, and MR4.5), whereas secondary outcomes included safety profiles and treatment discontinuation rates. Results: The systematic review identified eight eligible studies comprising more than 500 patients. In the pivotal ASC4FIRST phase 3 trial (n = 405), asciminib demonstrated superior efficacy compared with investigator‑selected TKIs. At 96 weeks, MMR rates were 74.1% with asciminib versus 52.0% with investigator‑selected TKIs (treatment difference, 22.4%; 95% CI, 13.6–31.3%; p < .001) and 76.2% versus 47.1% with imatinib (treatment difference, 29.7%; 95% CI, 17.6–41.8%; p < .001). The ASCEND study (n = 101) reported an MMR rate of 79% at 12 months. The safety profile was distinct from that of ATP‑competitive TKIs, with hypertension occurring more frequently with asciminib (all grades, 10.5%; grade ≥ 3, 5.5%) and arterial occlusive events (2.0% versus 1.5% for investigator‑selected TKIs). Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was lower with asciminib (5.0%) than with second‑generation TKIs (12.7%). Conclusion: Asciminib demonstrates superior efficacy and a favorable benefit‑risk profile as first‑line therapy for CML, with higher molecular response rates than both imatinib and second‑generation TKIs. Asciminib also has a favorable tolerability and safety profile; however, close monitoring for cardiovascular and pancreatic toxicities is required.

Asciminib demonstrates superior efficacy and a favorable benefit‑risk profile as first‑line therapy for chronic‑phase CML, with higher molecular response rates than both imatinib and second‑generation tyrosine‑kinase inhibitors.

Bizonyítékszint: Irányelv / elfogadott gyakorlat. Magas szintű klinikai elfogadottság.

Eredeti forrás

Kapcsolódó jelek