Clinical Trial Eligibility and Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic NSCLC Treated Outside of Clinical Trials
These data support less restrictive clinical trial eligibility criteria for patients with metastatic NSCLC.
A retrospective chart review of 170 patients with metastatic NSCLC who received first‑line systemic therapy was performed to evaluate whether patients would have met phase‑III trial eligibility criteria used for the specific regimens they received. Eligibility status was compared with restricted‑mean survival time. Overall, eligible patients had a longer survival (31.5 vs. 20.9 months, P=0.03). In the combined‑chemotherapy cohort, eligible patients survived significantly longer than ineligible patients (19.9 vs. 13.2 months, P=0.03), whereas differences were not significant in the immunotherapy or targeted‑therapy groups. Most ineligible patients were excluded for a single criterion, suggesting that modest loosening of eligibility would increase enrolment.
Reducing restrictive eligibility criteria can broaden trial generalizability, improve accrual, and provide real‑world evidence that patients who would otherwise be excluded can safely and effectively receive approved therapies.
Evidence level: Korai humán adat. Kis vagy feltáró emberi adat.
Related signals
- Telisotuzumab Vedotin + Osimertinib for Non‑Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Ramucirumab plus erlotinib in patients with untreated, EGFR‑mutated, advanced non‑small‑cell lung cancer (RELAY): a randomised, double‑blind, placebo‑controlled, phase 3 trial
- Recent advancements in lung cancer research: a narrative review
- Advances in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Insights and Future Directions
- Structured proxy features for multimodal NSCLC survival prediction from pretreatment CT